Sunday, October 13, 2013

Thespis Strip Dated Sunday, October 11, 2009

Click to embiggen.
TRANSCRIPT:
Collin, thinking: The speech bubble is a fairly old invention, seen in ancient Olmec- or was it Mayan- drawings.
In Medieval times, speech was represented by scrolls coming from the speaker's mouth.
But the history of the thought bubble is much more difficult to trace. While the speech balloon has been in its present form since the 18th century, the origins of 'the cloud" are much less defined.
But I'm wondering what these things are made out of.
Collin: Marvin, I really need you for an experiment, 'k?
Think something. Think anything.
Marvin: ...
Marvin, thinking: Oh, this is ridiculous.
Collin: Good. Now I want you to, quite literally...
Marvin, thinking: Oh, this is ridiculous.
Collin: Hold that thought.
Marvin, thinking: Oh, this is ridiculous.

Saturday, October 12, 2013

CHILDREN OF THE MIND, A Book Report I Wrote Once So Why Not

Children of the Mind opens on the Chinese planet Path, where a mysterious, somewhat angry young fellow calling himself Peter Wiggin steps out of a spaceship that seemed to have materialized out of thin air and whisks a girl named Si Wang-Mu away. He explains to her that he isn't the real Peter Wiggin -who was the ruler of Earth three thousand years ago- but rather a child straight out of the mind of the real Peter Wiggin's younger brother.

For thousands of years people have had to travel from planet to planet at the light speed limit. Relativity caused them to age less than those who hadn't gone at such a high speed, but this still meant that a voyage from planet to planet essentially cut one off from friends and family who didn't go on the trip, causing them to be either very old or dead when one arrived at the planet to which they were traveling. This is how Peter’s brother from thousands of years ago had lived so long, as to now create Peter II.

For the newly-discovered way to abolish the light-speed law, which is how Peter arrived at Path, had its own side-affect. This method required going outside of the physical universe itself, where time and space did not exist, to jump back at any point else in the universe. The lack of laws of physics made any human imagining come true. Ender Wiggin had subconsciously imagined younger versions of his siblings from thousands of years ago, and they had sprung full form from his head, his own children of the mind.

Peter further explains that he needed Si Wang-Mu, who, being from the planet Path, where children were raised to be especially brilliant, to help him. The International Fleet was sending ships to destroy the planet Lusitania, which allegedly housed a deadly virus known as the Descolada (Portuguese for ungluing) that “unglued,” as it were, the very foundations of DNA itself, causing horrible mutations and painful death. In reality, the problem of the Descolada had been solved by imagining an antidote for it in Outspace,  but there was no way for the International Fleet to know this because Lusitania wasn’t on the friendliest terms with them because of the way it handled the relations with its native life.  Peter needed Wang-Mu to help him stop the destruction of an entire planet.

They arrive instantly at the planet Kamikaze, whose Kyoto-spirit philosophers heavily influence the I.F.’s  policies. Peter needs Wang-Mu’s knowledge of the careful balance of the Oriental concepts of honor and dishonor into tricking one of the philosophers into revealing from where he gets his influences. Over an episode of power-play which Peter does not understand at all, he slips up, revealing himself to be a follower of the Ua Lava  philosophy of the planet Pacifica. Or, at least, implies it.

The final connection from him to the philosophy is made by the hyper intelligent Jane, who controls faster-than-light travel, and whose communication jewel Peter wears in his ear. Jane is much more than a computer program: she is actually a soul, or Aìua, whose body is the computer network between worlds. But the I.F. is on to her, and is beginning to shut all of the linked computers down, world by world. She is losing processing power, which she needs to hold the information of whatever she is sending to Outspace together. Faster-than-light travel will soon be ended, and without this, Lusitania is doomed to be destroyed.

So it is hurriedly that she sends Peter and Wang-Mu to Pacifica, and also hurriedly that she sends Ender’s other mind-child, Valentine, and Ender’s adopted son, Miro, to scout for planets to which the Lusitanians could escape before their planet is destroyed, even though all the hurrying is bad for Ender’s Aìua. Having one’s soul split into three- one part for yourself, and one for each of your two mind-children- strains it.  On the planet Lusitania, Ender lapses into a coma.

Valentine and Miro realize that there are enough planets to which the Lusitanians can flee, and realize that that isn’t their real assignment: they are searching for the planet of the alien species that created the Descolada.

On the planet Pacifica, Peter curls up into a ball in the sand as the jewel in his ear goes dead, and Jane dies. Orbiting around a sinister planet, with limited air supply and hostile aliens surrounding, Valentine, Miro, and other scientists are trapped, with no way out…

And the I.F.’s ships will soon arrive at Lusitania…

I’m going to end the plot summary section there. I am supposed to give the reader an incentive to read the book, aren't I?

I say that this was an amazing book, full of vivid detail and memorable, realistic characters. And the plot I’m giving isn't even the half of the thoroughly amazing universe presented to us between the covers of that book. I’m completely skipping out of the complex interrelationships the characters share. I’m not even mentioning the real Valentine, or Ender’s wife, Novinha, or Quara, or any of the Piggies, or Grace Drinker, or the Hive Queen, or Plikt, or the Fathertrees, or… etc, etc.

And yet I could. Each of these characters stands out vividly in my mind. I could tell you about Novinha’s tendency to blame herself for anyone’s death, even if she had nothing to do with it. I could tell you how spiteful and arrogant Quara is, or the Hive Queen’s lack of fear of death, or the way Grace Drinker’s husband makes jokes when he is trying to keep himself from going crazy and killing someone.

I could tell you about how much it hurt Miro to say mean things to Valentine when the situation forced him into it, or Peter’s evolution as a character, from being just the embodiment of a bad childhood memory Ender had of him to the young man who saved an entire planet by averting the Fleet’s ships.

In fact, I think that character is what moves the entire plot. Sure, there’s a little action, a little romance, a little humor, and a lot of suspense, but without characters those things couldn’t be there.
Although this book is actually forth and last in the Ender’s Quartet series, which began with science fiction classic Ender’s Game, I think that Card is a deft enough characterizer and plotter to make the complex plot and relationship issues understandable, making it possible to jump right into the book.

It’s still somewhat bittersweet to leave Ender’s universe behind, though. Luckily there’s also the Shadow Quartet, which chronicles the wars and political power struggle before the original, real Peter Wiggin came to power as ruler of the Hegemony of Earth. But those books have a much different feel than these ones. And then there’s always Ender’s Game itself, which is infinitely reread-able.
If you enjoy epic tales, philosophy, science, science fiction, good characterization, Portuguese culture, Japanese culture, Chinese culture, Icelandic culture, and metaphysics, then this book would be bizarrely, creepily suited for you.

If you enjoy a darn good yarn, then this book is good for that too.

Friday, October 11, 2013

CHILDREN OF THE MIND

   Don't have much of a plot review for you this time, because I figure I could just show you THE BOOK REPORT I DID ON IT. Just read that post, coming out tomorrow.

THE GOOD:
  1. The suspense of Starways Congress shutting down the ansible network to kill Jane.
  2. Two words: Bobby. Lands. 
  3. Peter and Wang-mu doing freaking awesome crap on Divine Wind. 
  4. Valentine and Val.
  5. The exploration of the angst of Ender's imagines (yes, that's seriously what they're called- imagines. Ih-may-gin-ese. The world is awesome) would make some awesome cinema.

THE BAD:
  1. Pretty much all of it's that. Imagines angsting. It works out fine in book form, but you'd probably need a fine director to bring that to the screen. Like Wes Anderson.
  2. The stuff with the souls bouncing around in space, while fine on the page, is downright trippy. Jane causing a mothertree to bear hyperfast-growing fruit? That's pretty, but... what?
  3. It's said Orson Scott Card just based this philotic science off of Mormon doctrine, so the entire thing could be seen as propaganda. The stuff with Ua Lava I can see that a little, but I don't remember anything in Sunday School Class where it talked about twining to the center of your planet through vibrations of love. Must have missed that part.

THE UGLY:
  1. The subterfuge scene where Si Wang-mu and Aimaina Hikari have the humility contest, each trying to out-humble the other to show themselves as being the more respectful, would be the single coolest scene in the film if done right (even cooler than the bits with Admiral Lands.) It would also be the most difficult if not impossible to translate to screen.
  2. More grounded scenes like that, balanced against the philotic souls-bouncing-around-in-space scenes.

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Flaming Building

   You, your child, your spouse, and your mother are trapped in a flaming apartment building. There's only time to save one of them, and... sigh. What... Why do... I mean, what's up with that? Never mind.

   And, by the way the "correct" answer is your mother, because you can always get remarried and pop out more babies, but you will only ever have one mom. See? It's ever worse. Thanks for asking.

Monday, October 7, 2013

Math Tools for Planet Worldbuilding

   Hey, look, it's Hugo-nominated, Nebular-winning sf/f author Eric Jame Stone's Gravitator gravity calculator for astronomical bodies! Just, you know, enter in the radius and relative density for the object you wish to calculate, and it spews forth the relative gravity and acceleration due to gravity! It's useful for, well, exactly that kind of thing. I guess. Want to know the gravity of a diamond the size of the earth, for, say, some kind of story in which your characters find a diamond the size of the earth? Easy! It's .64 Earth normal gravity. So, uh, now you know.

http://www.ericjamesstone.com/blog/home/gravity-calculator-for-astronomical-bodies-based-on-radius-and-density/

   And there's this tool I found, "Density of the Terrestrial Planets," which is sort of an educational exercise where you have to adjust the ratio of rock to iron core for the Earth, Mars, Mercury, Venus, and the Moon. It's useful for calculating the relative density of a planet based on its core composition.

http://www.mesacc.edu/~kev2077220/flash/planet-density.html

Sunday, October 6, 2013

Tom Cruise Day '13

   Tom Cruise day again! R0x0rs! This year's Tom Cruise Day comes with a movie recommendation, which I was really going to do the first time but got held up by the news of Jack Reacher. (How was that, by the way? Any good? Are they planning any sequels yet?)

   Knight and Day. It's a rom com, really, at its heart. Except the comedy here comes from playing with some of the more absurd tropes of the spy thriller genre, instead of wherever the heck the comedy is supposed to come from in normal rom-coms. The humor is really mature (no, not that kind of mature.) I mean, mature, like, it's... like a good cheese, or something. Tom is really free to crazy it up, which is one of the things that he does best. Some terrific action. Which would make it a great date film or something. Something in it for everyone.


   And I found the entire thing with way-off, Urdu-dubbed audio on YouTube! Oh, internet. Is there anything you can't do?

Saturday, October 5, 2013

Thespis Strip Dated Sunday, October 4, 2009

Click to embiggen.

TRANSCRIPT:
(Editor's Note: The Author wasn't able to meet the deadlines for this week's strip, so we have decided to offer you this cobble of all our favorite Thespis moments!)
(We hope it represents the Nietzschean subtext of the the strip without delving into the über-ipissimosity of the conceptual apparatus columbarium. In
Collin: fact, the "boy" in the name El Niño refers to baby Jesus, as the phenomenon was first reported around Christmastime by Peruvian fishermen in the late 1800s.
Marvin: Christmas Jones.
Collin: !
Marvin: It's...
Oohh, Never Mind!
Collin: I LIKE COOKIES!
Marvin, thinking: Yep, I'm definitely crazy.
Collin: Yo!
That's messed up.
Editor's Note: (On second thought, Nietzsche is over-rated.)

NOTES:
   I've changed my mind about Nietzsche since I wrote this, by the way. He was actually a pretty cool dude. I also would have used some different psychobabble had I wrote this strip nowadays. Well, had I wrote this strip nowadays, I wouldn't have even written it, as I realized that I had a deadline to do a strip and was in no position to draw and scan a new one, so I had to whip up a new one entirely using old strips and Paint. Later on I wouldn't care about missing deadlines so much. Keep an eye on those. They will be missed.

Friday, October 4, 2013

ENDER'S SHADOW

   We see the events of Ender's Game from the perspective of Bean. So brilliant, yet so simple.

THE GOOD:

  1. The closest to Ender's Game in terms of tone, and a lot of other things. The other books aren't very like Ender's Game at all.
  2. A sweet mystery going on meanwhile, back on earth.


THE BAD:

  1. By the time they get about making this, Aramis is going to be... not little. Special effects, I know. And his rapid development actually becomes a plot point in the rest of the books. But this takes place the same time the first one did.
  2. There's another one, which is actually more problematic than bad, so I'm putting it in "ugly."


THE UGLY:

  1. How to make this seem different enough from Ender's Game to make it not seem like blind repetition? It does take place at the same time in much the same location, using the same scenes but from a different perspective.
  2. The twist. It's no longer a twist. The problem in this lies on what they decide to do with the film of Ender's Game, and is not in itself problematic.


Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Patheticisms pt II: Unoriginality is A-okay!

   I'm not sure how I feel about that sort of pseudo-deepness you see a lot of in forums and blogs and, liner notes for webcomics, and these kinds of blogs. (Amateur blogs, of which, this is, you know, one, so I'll try not to get self indulgent/high and mighty, making out like I don't do that at times.) I'd been going to put "ie, strongly dislike" as a parenthetic after "not sure how I feel about," but I'll just let it stand for itself; I'm not sure how I feel about it. Pseudo deepness. It sounds pretty, as long as you have your brain switched off. If not... It's painful. Sort of, aww, cute, look, it's trying to form a coherent thought. It thinks it's people. With any form of expression, you have some who can navigate better than others, of course- some people, as well, aren't good at expression at all, so I give them a kudos or two for trying (kudos is singular! I know, isn't that surprising?) Even if you're super eloquent, though, and especially if you're not, well, you don't need to be. Ninety-nine percent of the stuff in the world has already been commented on after some fashion or another.

   That's why you don't always share your own beliefs and opinions, and don't always need to. You go with other peoples'. It would be helpful if you also agreed with them, of course, but even if you don't level 100% with them (and, once again, especially if you don't) you can also add your own commentary, advance the dialogue to your own degree of contribution (and even advance the dialogue by "contributing" something that someone else has already written.) It helps to source carefully and everything, too, looks more impressive if you admit that that sizzling slice of bacon ain't yours.

   How can deference make you look good? The better question is, why does it- and I've got a few reasons I came up with:

  1. It proves you know things about the scientific and/or literary greats, even enough to quote them and/or reflect an understanding of their views,
  2. It's less painful-- if not for you than certainly your audience; instead of having to come up with your own stuff and how to phrase it, just lift from someone else (once again, making sure to cite properly!) Why? because...
  3. They're (ostensibly) professionals, which means that they've had time to do that thinking while using a lot of different support and have managed to form a superior opinion. You haven't had that time, and also enjoy being lazy.
  4. Deference shows humility.

   Just cop someone else's that you know might be good, instead of go with your own stuff you suspect might be bad! Said the one who wrote this.

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Patheticisms pt I

   I can't tell which is more pathetic... Well, not "pathetic," because that coveys too much pejorativism which isn't my intent at all, but, but... Pathé. That's the name of that, what, film company or something, right? (I think they distributed Chicken Run.) Whatever. It's a good word. Pathé. Which is more pathé. This is a written medium, so I realize that I've got time to look up the proper word and come back and continue this whenever and you wouldn't even notice or mind, but, I kind of like that.

   So. I cannot tell which is more pathé: blogs or forums. Speaking of electronic media here (and kind of having a breakdown for being a blogger) but it doesn't have to be; doesn't matter the medium. "Forum" is a good word no matter the medium for what I'm trying to get at, but the other guy-- lone commentators, not per se speaking as part of a larger community, only reacting when it serves his interests, that kind of thing-- I'm not sure if there's an intrinsic word for the concept, but compared against "forum" I think you can catch my drift. Forums, there's a community; blogs, there's, that thing I just said. The internet is a "flat" medium, meaning here, one that most anyone can access, and with content that ostensibly can be accessed equally (net neutrality politics aside- we're focusing on the web as ideally "flat," here.) In such a flat medium, is it better to be anonymous or visible? Or is that at the heart of the idea of the internet or any other flat space, taking away the third parties, as with the direct distribution market?

   So it comes down to the old apparent dichotomy, depth versus breadth (I say "apparent" dichotomy because I'm not sure if it really is or not- I haven't seen anything contradicting the notion, but I'm not about to make such a broad sweep on that alone.) Depth versus breadth- my own stance is, hey guys balance is nice, which seems to do me fine so far.

   A forum, you get to see this community in action, and get to see different minds coalesce, argue, joke. Argue. Blogging, on the other hand, is more, focused. A core sample taken from a tree (or... something. That's a good metaphor, right?...) In a forum, to see one individual's viewpoint you have to dig more to see within a post the allusions to past posts a poster has made, right? They're just one of the voices there, versus on something more personal like a web log, where it's primarily about their voice, so it'd be more worth it to invest in such an expenditure. And easier. Even with microblogging.

   ...Especially with microblogging.

   Why pay attention to someone when it's about their voice? We're fascinated by celebrities, aren't we. You don't mind listening to a speaker if you think the speaker is in some way talented. It's good to see that these people have lives, you know? You feel happy for them. It's good to see that they're living, or still alive, at least. We get something directly out of it; it benefits us in some way.

   Forums and comments boards can be a fine fine thing, providing you're interested in the subject (and really, why would you be anywhere if you weren't?) Such a wide variety can be fascinating. It can also be full of flamewars and arguments that quickly make you lose hope in humanity. The worst a blogger can do is make you lose hope in that one blogger, unless you perceive them to be holding an opinion congruent with the views of wider humanity-- (people are scum, except when they're not.)

   Speaking more generally now, in the wider "blogosphere" it is once more about combined opinions, but some would find the amount of time it takes to get the gamut to be a bit excessive. Microblogging comes back in here- it's a really nice balance. Hey guys, we found a really nice balance.

   And I'm done here.

Monday, September 30, 2013

Sept 2013

   Somehow somewhere along the line I came under the impression that the milk powder plant they're building here in Fallon would be up this month, September 2013. I'm fairly certain that's accurate, but it could be the expanded Perazzo Brothers dairy barn scheduled for September, or it could be the powder plant scheduled for September of '14, or it could be both, or even both of those things, or even vice versa.

   Either way, if everything went according to plan, according to the schedule of which I have knowledge-- if everything went according to plan then we should have a brand spanking new milk powder plant. Right here in Fallon. Very exciting for the local dairy industry, gonna be a lot of expansion. Milk powder sometimes explodes (!), so I hope everything is safe, and since I *prescheduled this I hope that doesn't strike as being horribly ironic because that actually happened.

   That'd suck.

Sunday, September 29, 2013

Thespis Strip Dated Sunday, September 27, 2009

Click to embiggen.
TRANSCRIPT:
Marvin: 'Sup.
A lot of you out there are probably wondering about Collin's seemingly uncharacteristic behavior in last week's strip.
Well, according to...
...some dude's...
...theory of characterization, any character is capable of performing any action at any time.
No matter How uncharacteristic.
All the author need do is provide significant motive, so as to not abandon...
SUSPENSION -->OF<-- DISBELIEF.
or whatever.
For example:
(Man this hurts.)

Saturday, September 28, 2013

A... Cheesy... Commercial?? Dang these are hard

   Holy crud. The presidential candidate running for office who ruins his chances by declining a cheese plate in that old "power of cheese" commercial? Gregory Itzin, looking exactly like a younger Charles Logan of 24. Look, right there, on the microphone in the preview frame! It even has a little "24!"


   Also, that's not how you pronounce "Gouda." But it's all right, because it's not even technically cheese, I don't think, and the ADA would know that, so I always figure they're being subtly ironic when they make jokes like that.

   That is all.

Friday, September 27, 2013

SHADOW OF THE HEGEMON

   A direct sequel to Ender's Shadow, it establishes a very heavy tone of military intrigue throughout the entire series.

THE GOOD:
  1. Petra smuggling out a message in the dragon- that scene alone would make the film worth it
  2. Petra tearing the psychologist to shreds.
  3. Bean talking to Theresa Wiggin about Ender.

THE BAD:

  1. Sister Carlotta's death takes place by necessity offscreen.
  2. The stuff in captivity. Not much goes on there.


THE UGLY:

  1. Virlomi is introduced here (she wasn't in any books previous) and she plays a pretty big part.
  2. Aramis Knight, who plays Bean, will have grown just perfectly by this time to fit the Anton's Key he's-a-giant bits. That's not what concerns me. It really depends on how far after the other movies they start this.


Thursday, September 26, 2013

Feline Behavior

   Got the cat up on the desk, turned the desk light on behind it, and it turned around to look at the light. It can later be seen examining it. Suggesting that in some sense animals have got some idea of the concept of light- instead of seeing the shadow in front of himself as a novelty, the cat deduces that the shadow is cast by the novelty of the light behind him. And it was definitely the lightbulb, instead of the sound of it clicking on, that caught the cat's attention. It might have been the heat of the bulb, but I doubt the bulb would get hot as quickly as the cat reacted to it...

   Still haven't eliminated the possibility that the cat heard the click of it turning on, turned around for that, and saw that the light itself was on. That's not what it looked like, but that's a possibility. Nor have I eliminated the possibility of, like, ultraviolet sight or other sensory forms that we humans don't have but animals do (infrasound?) Cat's refusing to cooperate right now for further experimentation, so, sure, it's not so far fetched to assume that the cat just sees that the lightbulb is on- it's actually kind of downright silly to say anything else.

   So, yes, the cat saw that the light was on. What does this say? That the cat understands what light is? That's how it would appear. Anything else? Nope, nothing else. Why, then, you may ask, is this so important?

   Well, if the animal understands that light comes from a source, this certainly changes (or sheds new light on- no pun intended, but that still feels icky) the cat's relationship with laser pointers.

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Pets

   Watching a kitten playing with tassels, it occurred to me that the aloofness cats take from you might be their own special kind of draw. There's the obvious always-eager-to-please nature of dogs, but cats, eh... I'm just doin' my own thing. Tassels, man. Tassels.

   And then there's weasels, the third most popular pet, which- I don't know, whatever weasels do. Be cute, and only occasionally rabid? Makes sense to me.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

And Here It Is

   Um, here it is, my first post from my mission. First, and only, actually. I knew that if worst came to worst I could always do this and send out posts via email like I’m doing with this one, but Cailin said if it’s causing me that much of a hassle just drop it, and I realized that in this instance her laziness is actually a good influence on me so I can focus on my work better and all that.

   My mission gets out for me on not the 7th of December (which is two years from when I got out) but the 21st of November- or as early as the 19th, if I understand correctly (my understanding is, there’s a final luncheon on the second-to-last Wednesday of the month and you can just leave whenever you want after that?) So I could get out on my birthday, even. That’d be rad. (I want a PS4. And some books. And we’ll talk later.) 


   I’ll be back, I guess. Yes, there are still going to be posts between then; it’s just going to be kind of intermittent from now on. There are if I’m calculating correctly, 124 days from here till 2015 that there won’t be any posts on; out of about 1 ¼ years (I don’t have the energy to do the exact calculation right now), that’s only about a quarter of the posts (I don’t have the energy to do the exact calculation right now), which I’d say considering the circumstances is pretty good. That means, on average (I don’t have the energy to do the exact calculation right now), 3/4ths of the time there still will be posts, so keep checking back and stuff. I’ll be back, I promise; till then, don’t be surprised if there are gaps (which, again I promise, I’ll fill up from the future as though they never existed. Orwellianism is a go.)

   Though I didn't get all of my posts scheduled, scheduling was still important somehow. A few explanations as to why that is:

  1. There’s a parable/object lesson that I think fits- you fill up the Mason jar with big things, which allows smaller things to trickle down through. I filled up the schedule with the big stuff first (comics, mostly), and then I could work on the littler stuff.
  1. Idle hands- Scheduling so many posts, though I didn't get through with 100% of it, gave me something to do at a crucial time. There were so many non-Kosher ways I could have diddled around online right before my mission. I don’t have the energy to do the math here either. Suffice it to say, many, many ways.
  1. Learning to review and organize. I categorized posts into levels of necessity, what was worth sharing and what was best to hold off on until later, to be expanded. I do have more than the needed number of posts in my “drafts” folder, but I’d rather put out 75% of my 100% than 100% of my 75%. I hope that that’s a good thing. Anyway, I learned to put up only quality posts at the expense of getting everything done. That probably won’t cut it in the real world, but by showing pride in my work, I hope I’m also showing integrity. I don’t think I’d do it again, but maybe I would. Not sure.


   If I had known that it’s not exactly two years, maybe I would have been a little better in my schedulings. Maybe even, a little more inspired. But, ah, oh well. With the 18-20 fewer days that need the pre-posts, maybe those could have been crunched together? I can do that when I get back, as a future-post thing. The world is kind of depressing. (Not the dark, horrible stuff, mind you, but the blazingly awesome stuff.) I think I’ll withdraw from it for a while.


   But I will be back! Have my terrible fan arts improved at all over the course of the mission? What will my thoughts be on that My Little Pony “Equestria Girls” feature (I’ve seen the DVDs at Wal Mart, chill out)? And, some other third hypothetical question? I guess we’ll see!

Monday, September 23, 2013

A New Tack

   Yeah, I was right. There won't be enough time to do it all. All of the posts. So either I drop it and the posts will only pop up sporadically based on the ones I have already in the past managed to schedule for the future, or this continues being daily but not posted by me. They can still be composed by me, I mean, there's email I'm allowed to send, but, somebody else is going to have to do the actual physical posting.

   From where I'm standing, As I write this, I have 591 of the 730 posts needed posted, (597 discounting the ones set to publish after my return but I scheduled them beforehand anyway because that'd be easier,) and about 70 minutes left to post the rest. I suppose I could spend less than one minute per post through the little more 100 posts I need to get up, but...

   When offered a choice, you're going to pick quality every time.

   I continue to stall in posting this, seeing how close I can get, until the last few minutes. This time tomorrow, if you see a post here it'll be from on an e-mail my mission. Not all future posts, of course. But some of them.

   (It's not poor planning on my part; the internet chose a very bad time to shut itself down last night so I had to drop my plans, and I knew that I always had the option of composing posts via e-mail anyway, which was actually my original plan.)

Sunday, September 22, 2013

Thespis Strip Dated Sunday, September 20, 2009

Click to embiggen.
TRANSCRIPT:
Collin: Stinking Doug. Thinks he's so great just 'cos his mouth is made out of cheese.
Doesn't even specify what kind of cheese... Sure sign that he's lying if he doesn't do that.
Marvin: Hey Collin, I was just wondering if I could borrow-
Collin: HEY! EVERYBODY COME OVER TO MY PLACE FOR A WINE AND CRACKERS PARTY!!!
YAAAAAA!
Marvin: ...
You know, I could really say anything at this point and it would drive the point home.

Saturday, September 21, 2013

Drawing Techniques: It's Okay to Trace

   It's okay to trace. As long as you're paying attention to what you're doing and what the original artist did. It's okay to trace.

   As a learning exercise, I mean. Trace a drawing right there in the center of the paper, and then around the edges; make sketches that demonstrate the techniques you learned. I'd post up some of my own art where I did this, but seeing how the entire center of the page would be occupied by a cheap copy of someone else's most-likely-copyrighted work of art, I think I'll skip that.