Sunday, March 31, 2024

List of Philosophers/Academics Mentioned in the Latest GSSB

I'm doing a blogpost a month this year and it's the end of the month and I need something to write about! Luckily GAMES STUDIES STUDY BUDDIES, one of my favorite podcasts, released a new episode today, and I listened to it while working on my project, and can write about that!

It's a podcast about making academic books on games studies accessible. I wrote down every scholar (etc) they mentioned or cited in this episode, though, (just got curious when they mentioned my boy Lévi-Strauss and decided to go back to the top and take notes this time,) and it's still... quite academic.

Jaroslav Švelch- the book they did this month is Player vs Monster, instead of his Gaming the Iron Curtain, because it's shorter and they have to read like four books a month across their various podcasts. Maybe someday.

Katherine Isbister- How Games Move Us

Kyra D. Gaunt- never mentioned by name, but the catchphrase of the podcast, "the social is predicated on its exclusions," is from the book The Games Black Girls Play, and it gets discussed several times throughout the beginning of the episode.

Torill Mortensen

Darshana Jayemanne

Sarah Stang

Julia Kristeva

Barbara Creed

Stephanie C Jennings

Gerard Jones- Killing Monsters: Why Children Need Fantasy, Super Heroes, and Make-Believe Violence

Noël Carroll

Michel Foucault

Immanuel Kant

Mary Douglas- Purity and Danger

Klaud Lévi-Strauss

Norbert Elias- The Civilizing Process

Graham Harman

David Wengrow

Forrest J Ackerman- Famous Monsters of Film Land

Hiroki Azuma

Patrick Crogan- Gameplay Mode:War, Simulation, and Technoculture. 

Peter Galison: The Ontology of the Enemy: Norbert Wiener and the Cybernetic Vision

Patricia MacCormack

They talk about this video near the end, which video I've referenced myself on this blog, so, Chris Franklin? Who introduced me to the Ranged Touch line of podcasts, incidentally enough.



Thursday, February 29, 2024

Getting in on that Book Club Convo

For Christmas we started a family book club, and the first book up was Boundaries: When to Say Yes How to Say No to Take Control of Your Life. I was at dress rehearsal for Fiddler on the Roof during the discussion on it so I missed that! So I figured I should make this month's blog post about it!

December's post, "ambition, obligation, followthrough," is about how I do many a thing I do because I feel obligated to do it, which is fitting to bring up again given the subject matter of the book. The central metaphor of the blogpost is the final couple of episodes of Neon Genesis Evangelion, the Third Impact, which is funny, because Boundaries is a very Evangelion book. Christianity aside, even (all the Christian images in Eva are just because Japanese people think it's cool and exotic.) 

The Third Impact (the first impact was the creation of the moon and the second impact was the awakening of Adam) is the dissolution of human boundaries, causing all human beings' souls to essentially merge into one as we evolve into the final Angel. The Angels (an advanced alien species who are also the progenitors of humans) shield themselves with forcefields called AT Fields, which it turns out that humans also have: Absolute Terror is that which keeps us separate as beings and prevents us from intimacy. The Hedgehog's Dilemma. The evolution of our understanding of boundaries as an infant, growing up and realizing that our mother is not ourself but another, is an important philosophical theme that gets discussed in these episodes, and is talked about in Boundaries the book.

But anyway, like, I don't know what they discussed during the discussion, but I guess I should talk about my actual takeaways here though, like, what did I learn here, if I do things only because I feel obligated, how do I set boundaries for myself there? When I'm already okay saying no to doing things I don't feel obligated to do? Do I have a choice on what I feel obligated on and what I don't? I'm not sure the answer to that. Maybe it's possible to get finer toothed with it, tease out parts of tasks that I do feel obligated on and separate them from others?

I'm certain yes, but that leaves me uncertain of where to go from there: for example, I feel it would be better to write more to this post, better still to have something to say on the book, better still to have more personal takeaways, but I only feel an obligation for the first few things. There is plenty I'd love to say no to, but still feel an obligation towards, so maybe this idea of drilling down on which aspects I feel that obligation about and why can be a takeaway, even if it's not something that the book is even about.

Another thing that just sprang to mind after I hit publish on this: prioritization! Today I felt "obligated" to make a blog post, do rehearsals, get in some final updates to my monthly journal, catch some films before they leave streaming, finish up my brown-tagged graphics on my video project. Overcoming an illness, however, and sleeping fifteen hours today (and about to go to bed early right now) I prioritized doing this blogpost apparently. And rehearsals. And Duolingo; I'm out of streak freezes. As nice as it would have been to work on my video project today, getting my brown-tagging in by the end of the month (premiere date May 4 2024!) I can't feel the roof of my mouth, so, my health has always been more of a priority than working on the project, even when I'm doing serious crunching I've always gotten in at least seven hours of sleep.

Saturday, January 13, 2024

Of Negative Tests and Workloads

If you read my WordPress blog you'd know that a.) I tested positive for COVID-19 two weeks ago and b.) I've been watching a lot of Lindsay Ellis videos lately, kinda. I still have all of "loose canon" to get through, those videos are relatively short but there's a lot of 'em, and AS A GRAPHIC DESIGNER IT'S REALLY BOTHERING ME HOW THE SINGLE AND DOUBLE QUOTES ARE ACTUALLY JUST FOOT AND INCH MARKS you don't see these kind of shenanigans on WordPress, I grew complacent or something.

‘“”’ see isn’t that refreshing. I mean it’s not "incorrect" to use "straight marks" necessarily, or even at all, they’re just forms of quotation marks, it’s not like programs that convert ASCII-style marks like that to their curly brethren are 100% accurate in their automatic doing so, but (is that why it)’s bothering me so much because the " marks look like a positive COVID result
So I figured I’d get a post in today, while it’s still the day that I’ve tested negative (for the first time in my life actually, I think. I hadn’t actually taken a COVID test (I don’t think) until that first one on Jan 1, which read | |, which = +.) Here’s the thing- I was kind of getting used to having COVID. I was getting used to never leaving the house and barely even leaving my room. I was especially getting used to not having to go to work.

One year ago, from the very beginning of April to the last week in June, I took what was initially supposed to be one month off, which spiraled into almost three-- working on my project, my 9-and-a-half-hour-long YouTube project. (urgh and it’s doing a double en dash instead of a single em dash)

Initially the plan was to work on that project last Tuesday, from even before I would turn out spending the day in quarantine: it’s a vlog of 2 January, and so last year for a chunk there the idea was that it would come out 2 January, albeit a few years on. The idea before that had been 4 May, and that’s the idea again, but the current draft is labeled the 2 January draft- so, you figure, January 2nd would be an excellent time to finish a draft labeled January 2nd. But.

all- of- my- notes

whichI’dbeengoingtocompile

in the, it’s fine it’s fine, draft,

all my notes that I’d taken over no less than three separate occasions last year watching through the entire almost-10-hour-video and taking notes, those notes are in my personal planner: which, thing number c.) because I also talked about it in my WordPress blog, it’s all in my personal planner for last year, and said planner is ???, might as well be at the bottom of the sea, lost it somewhere a few weeks ago and I’m at a total loss as to where.

So I couldn’t actually work on the draft on the day I’d been planning on it. And for an entire week, a little over, I couldn’t even put in any editing work in the places I knew were already working but could just use some footage going on in the background, because it was like, nooo, it needs to be done in the correct order. In my brain.

So last week I spent watching... (...grabbing my personal planner for this year and looking through it) westerns, and Real Steel, and the Guardians of the Galaxy vol 3 director’s commentary, and a double feature of Titanic and Birdman of all things, and rewatching Jurassic Park and Glass Onion. And a bunch of Lindsay Ellis videos. And reading a bunch too. But no working on my project! Except for to, mask up occasionally and upend a bunch of furniture in search of my dang At-A-Glance!

But halfway into this week I could finally start working on my project again, At-A-Glance or no. Did that for a full day, only pausing to film for a different project while the lighting was good, and to catch the latest Folding Ideas video which had come out within the past 24 hours. Mostly working on my project though. Editing, but also making the adjustments to the script that I remembered at least needed to be made. That was Thursday. And yesterday...

Yesterday I took a break for, not the entire day but it felt like it was going to be.

Tim Rogers’ Action Button Reviews is a YouTube series I take great inspiration from whether I want to or not, where he talks ostensibly about video games but really about everything; the shortest episode is over three hours long, and he bleeds for that time, through each and every video. He’s on season two right now, but the finale of season one is a multi-part choose-your-own-adventure playlist where he talks about Cyberpunk 2077: a game pretty good for something made entirely of problems. There are eight parts to the review: an introduction, six chapters, and a conclusion; the idea is that you open, choose two of the internal six chapters to watch, before reaching the conclusion. (If you watch all eight chapters the whole thing is even longer than my own 9-hour-twentysomething-minute video, but that’s proscribed. And so instead you watch through it three times, which takes a little over four hours longer.) I’d already watched through it twice before, and so yesterday I began (and today I finished) the path where I could sweep up the final two chapters I had not yet gotten to. I’d forgotten how much Tim Rogers bleeds for that time.

I also watched a Lindsay Ellis livestream she did with a bunch of her YouTube cocreators (her cocreators! thing number d.)), on Nebula (though it is on YouTube, just unlisted (you can get to it through a playlist though.)) It’s about persona, the identity these creators, semi-public figures, craft to present themselves as on the internet. It was also pretty raw, and contextualized a lot of stuff I hadn't even realized lacked context beforehand.

So there was, time, for introspection on a lot of stuff, why exactly (for the millionth time it feels like sometimes) I feel like this video needs to exist in the world, why I need to make video at all. Last night I dreamt I was starting up a new channel, and had a good workflow and a solid first video guaranteed to be a hit and generate a lot of views (maybe even some ad revenue.) And I’d just started, but I felt like I could reliably put out one video every two weeks- and my agent (?) was thus all, great, you’re going to need to do two videos every one week. And I had my passion project video which it would take two weeks to do, but I had one day before I needed to put out a new video, and no matter what I decided to do it was a compromise, and I was waking up on a morning where I would need to do an entire video from conception to publication in one day.

But I actually did do work on the video yesterday.

Five sections, not counting interludes, each section taking place in four segments, that's twenty segments in total. Of those twenty, I have one that’s basically finished (just need to shoot a five-second bit of footage) and one that’s let’s say half-finished (there’s a text I quote extensively from and I need to make it visually interesting somehow, but the rest of the segment is 100% done.) I’ll plug in an hour’s worth of work and I’ll wind up with twenty seconds of footage in the background, of a nine-hour video: but those are some handsome twenty seconds.

All this is to say, in between the introspection and the editing and the fact that I’m used to not having to go into work, and the fact that Tim Rogers did seventeen consecutive 20-hour workdays in a row to edit the masterpiece that is his 5:56:26 Tokimeki Memorial video (bleeds)(I'm not sure of course how comparable it is putting together video game footage and putting together movie footage)* and that I want some bleedtime before the May 4th deadline, and also I’ll have Fiddler rehearsals again for the next two months... I really really want to do that again, just for this month, taking time off of work so that I can work on the video. 

But also I’m afraid it’s just going to look like I’m chickening out of working outside because of the weather.

*To compound the question of how relevant this is, but to explain the relevance at all: by the time I reached the end of June being off of work for those three months, my editing pace was sluggish. I felt uninspired, felt like I wasn't getting anywhere, and was working on the project less time per day than I worked while I was still holding down a steady job. There was no reason anymore to miss out on my job, which I genuinely love. Now, however, I’m feeling genuinely inspired to edit again. But sometimes there’s a (visual) metaphor you can achieve using video game footage that you shot, that you just can’t achieve with footage from the movie you’re talking about.