I was going to say this earlier, like, post this earlier, until I realized I didn't have much to go off on at that time. I did mention in in passing in post: Which is It, Then? "That Murdoch guy, is he crazy or what?" But I've got that now. Stuff to go off of. It's not much, but, man...
That Murdoch guy, is he crazy or what? In A-Team (I hope I didn't really need to clarify that.) The team are even seen to need to bust him out of an insane asylum in order to assemble. You know? Dude's just crazy. It's not Hollywood insanity, either (which just appears to be schizophrenia, if you analyse what Hollywood depicts when they depict "crazy.") Murdoch, though. He's like, he's actually crazy. Loose-wired. So here we go.
Insanity is doing something the same over and over again but expecting a different result each time. Or whatever, right. Retardation. The inability to conceive of an alternative to the tack you're trying. But isn't there also a fine line between insanity and genius? Indubitably. So either way, the insane are in the top or bottom two or three percentiles, of retardation and genius.
Is insanity worth it? I don't know, it's not like bipolarity where you swing between the two. You just continue down your path, independent of whether you're being smart or dumb at any given time.
No comments:
Post a Comment