THE QUESTION: I know, a lot of the backlash seems to revolve entirely around the Red Eye report on BroNYCon, (I had covered this before, but apparently it's not just Q who thinks so) but I don't think that's what happened here in this instance- I just think Joe Kilmartin is a member of the 99% (that somehow makes sense.) Alright, maybe not. He's a Canadian comic-book store manager (with an adorably pear-shaped head (link opens in new window)) and his only exposure to Red Eye is through bitter bronies who can't take a joke. I've reviewed that episode over and over, and I really can't see it. Is it the "if you can call them that?" That's the only thing even vaguely close to negative that I can see. Greg says that about- well, everyone. Noted Brony Andrew W. K. is a semi-regular guest on that show, for crying out loud. Hold on, gonna do a bit more research now.
THE ANSWER: I've really got no idea.
Are they... are they looking at the same video? Well, yes, they are, because it's delineated quite clearly right there, but...
Okay, there was a FOX affiliate (a-filly-ate?)- affiliate, mind you (FOX 2 St. Louis)- whose news program had a year before ran a story about people who stay home to collect disability paychecks, and they kind of implicated Bronies in that, but, if you get those two mixed up, I really don't know what to do with you.
Also, there's this, but it's counteracted by not being negative and instead being freaking funny:
http://www.cracked.com/photoplasty_294_the-18-most-viral-photos-next-12-months_p18/#8 |
No comments:
Post a Comment